Entrambe le cose.
Secondo me la seconda meta italiana poteva anche essere annullata. Ce l'hanno data e va bene, ma se l'annullava non era uno scandalo.
La questione fondamentale è la domanda negativa che viene posta:
"C'è una ragione per la quale dovrei non accordare la meta?"
Il TMO gli dice che non trova una ragione per non accordare la meta, ovvero che i dubbi persistono ma che non possono essere eliminati per annullarla.
Altro che l'ambiguità del VAR.
Metto la regola completa per informazione:
1) Is it a try–yes or no?
2) Can you give me a reason why I cannot award a try?
3) But for the act of foul play – probable try or no try?
1.5 The TMO will then liaise with the TV director and look at all available footage in order to
gather enough information in order to provide informed advice.
1.6 The broadcaster must provide all the angles requested by the TMO.
1.7 When the TMO has concluded his analysis he will provide the match referee with his advice and recommendations. The referee should repeat theTMO’s recommendation to ensure
that he is absolutely satisfied that he has heard what has been recommended.
1.8 The TMO will then advise the referee as to when he may go ahead and signal his decision.
(This process is important in order to allow time for TV to focus their cameras on the
referee for his decision).
1.9 The referee will then communicate his decision in the correct manner. Play will then
continue and the time clock restarted.
